The Organic Compromise?

Posted in Blog, General News on Thursday, July 03, 2025

Farmers, retailers, and consumers all want more organic, but the road to get there isn’t as green as it seems.

The Organic Compromise?

WASHINGTON STATE is known for its breathtaking landscapes, crisp apples, and robust agricultural economy. From the sprawling wheat fields of the Palouse to the apple orchards of the Yakima Valley, the Evergreen State produces over 300 different crops and ranks among the top agricultural states in the nation. But as consumer demand for organic produce continues to rise, a crucial question looms for Washington’s farms: Can organic methods meet the demands of modern populations without sacrificing productivity or sustainability?

Organic farming, once a fringe movement born in the early 20th century as a reaction to the increasing industrialization of agriculture, has steadily grown into a mainstream force. Initially rooted in the philosophies of soil health and ecological harmony promoted by pioneers like Sir Albert Howard and J.I. Rodale, organic farming gained traction in the 1970s as environmental awareness and health concerns rose. By the early 2000s, the U.S. Department of Agriculture had formalized national organic standards, and what began as a grassroots effort is now a multibillion-dollar industry.

The mainstreaming of the once niche category of organic foods — grown without synthetically manufactured fertilizers or pesticides — can be largely held up to generational factors. According to a report from the Organic Trade Association, organic foods are becoming increasingly more important among younger shoppers, with an average increase of importance of 36% among Millennials and Gen Zs.

Not only does the mainstreaming of organic foods mean that there are more organically produced fruits, vegetables, meats, and dairy products available, it also means customers no longer need to venture to specialty (and often more expensive) grocery stores for them. Rather, they can stock up at Costco and other megastores on organic items like fresh produce, dried fruits, frozen vegetables, and prepared sauces and salsas, while bulk-buying other necessities.

The only hitch in the organic revolution is that growers can’t seem to grow enough to keep consumers satisfied. Costco, which is the nation’s leading seller of organic fruits and vegetables, has spent the last decade as the nation’s proverbial canary in the coal mine. "We just cannot get enough organics to stay in business day in and day out," former Costco CEO Craig Jelinek told investors in 2016.

Organic farming gives consumers alternative choices by using different growing practices, eschewing synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. The end result, to follow the thinking, is foods that consumers trust and feel good about and are willing to pay a premium for. But applying these principles at scale comes with complications and contradictions. In reality, it’s not as though organic crops aren’t sprayed with chemicals — it’s that they are sprayed only with specifically approved chemicals, which in many cases are less effective than the nonorganic alternatives. The reality is that organic farming methods reduce the yield that farmers can grow and means that crops are more vulnerable to pests and diseases.

One of the most pressing issues facing organic farming is yield. Organic wheat, for example, tends to yield 20–30% less than conventional wheat in Eastern Washington. The gap widens when farmers face difficult seasons marked by pests, drought, or disease. Without quick-response synthetic treatments, large-scale organic farms often find themselves vulnerable to unpredictable forces.

Labor is another major concern. Organic weed control often means hand labor or expensive alternatives like flame weeding — especially in row crops such as carrots or the sweet onions grown around Walla Walla. These increased labor demands, in an already tight farm labor market, can make organic growing impossible or drive up production costs.

Pest and disease management is also more challenging on a large scale. Conventional growers may use pheromone traps and synthetic sprays to manage outbreaks, while organic growers must rely on time-intensive methods like biological controls and repeated applications of organic-approved sprays, which are often less effective. Ironically, sometimes this means that organic crops are sprayed with pesticides more frequently than nonorganic crops. Codling moths, a perennial problem in apple orchards, are difficult to control with approved organic pesticides. Cherries, another iconic Washington crop, are particularly susceptible to fungal diseases like powdery mildew. Without conventional fungicides, organic cherry growers often suffer higher losses, especially in wet springs.

Beyond production issues, there’s the hurdle of transitioning. Before a farm can become certified organic, it must go through a 3-year period without synthetic inputs. During this time, farmers experience yield drops but cannot yet charge organic prices, creating a financial bind. For growers managing thousands of acres, this transition can be risky and cost-prohibitive. Certification also brings added bureaucracy — rigorous recordkeeping, audits, and compliance requirements that scale poorly for massive operations without dedicated staff.

Despite these challenges, many Washington farms are finding ways to embrace organic principles without going fully organic. Some are adopting "regenerative" practices like reduced tillage, composting, and cover cropping — methods that improve soil health and reduce chemical use without requiring full certification. Others are taking a hybrid approach, converting only a portion of their acreage to organic while maintaining conventional production elsewhere. This strategy allows them to test organic methods and build institutional knowledge without jeopardizing their bottom line.

Education options are available across the state for those interested in organic farming. Evergreen State College, in Olympia, has a 5-acre organic farm connected to it's main campus, where students participate in a "living laboratory," producing fruits, vegetables, eggs, chickens, herbs, cut flowers, and plant starts. Across the state in Pullman, Washington State University offers a similar experience at their Eggert Family Organic Farm for students enrolled in the "Organic and Sustainable Agriculture" major through their College of Agriculture, Human and Natural Resource Sciences. In the Skagit Valley, the Rodale Institute operates a "living laboratory" at their 90-acre organic farm for the purpose of research, education, and consulting.

Some of the changes attached to organic farming have been widely adopted in Washington state. Soil health measures, like cover crops and crop rotation, are especially beneficial in Washington’s eastern wheat-growing regions, where limited rainfall and lack of organic material in the soils means that growers can’t tolerate any nutrient depletion. By rotating wheat with nitrogen-fixing legumes like lentils or chickpeas, farmers can reduce their use of expensive chemical fertilizers. Meanwhile, fruit orchards in the Wenatchee and Yakima valleys benefit from practices that encourage pollinator health. By avoiding certain pesticides and maintaining native plants around orchards, organic growers attract beneficial insects that are vital for pollination.

For farmers that choose to go organic, a huge draw is economic. Organic products often command significantly higher prices. Washington-grown organic apples, for instance, can sell for nearly double the price of their conventional counterparts. The state already leads the nation in organic apple and pear production, with over 30,000 acres certified organic. Large operations like Zirkle Fruit and Stemilt Growers have proven that with the right infrastructure and knowledge, organic production can scale profitably.

In a state like Washington, where a growing segment of organic farms is entering the market, the future may lie in finding a healthy compromise. Organic farming is neither a silver bullet nor an impossibility. It requires innovation, flexibility, and a willingness to evolve. For some crops and regions, it’s already proving successful. For others, the path may be longer and more complex. As Washington’s farms look to the future, the choice may not be between organic and conventional, but how best to blend the two.

As Seen in Our Magazine

Newsletter